<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/7.2.5-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Wayne D's Blog - Latest Comments on Beware of Using URL Shorteners with Facebook</title>
		<link>https://wdawe.com/index.php?blog=1&#38;disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://wdawe.com/index.php?blog=1&#38;tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=383" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-CA</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=7.2.5-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title> refurbish computer [Visitor] in response to: Beware of Using URL Shorteners with Facebook</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_520">refurbish computer</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visitor]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c520@https://wdawe.com/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to imagine a Web sans URL shortening services nowadays but you can rest assured that they’re here to stay – for better or worse. Question is: how do the likes of bit.Ly, Tiny URL and Google score in terms of speed and availability?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s hard to imagine a Web sans URL shortening services nowadays but you can rest assured that they’re here to stay – for better or worse. Question is: how do the likes of bit.Ly, Tiny URL and Google score in terms of speed and availability?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://wdawe.com/index.php/careful-when-using-url-shorteners-with-facebook?blog=1#c520</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Kas [Visitor] in response to: Beware of Using URL Shorteners with Facebook</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 06:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_394">Kas</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visitor]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c394@https://wdawe.com/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I can see why they blocked it. With the rise of spam becoming an even larger problem and social networking becoming a very popular avenue for spammers to now scam people and trick people into following links that lead them to sites that redirect to yet another site to force them to install malicious content to their computers in the back ground without them knowing and stealing their bank info or passwords and then hijacking their facebook account .. Facebook had to do something! I think it is a wise move as their own url shortener service would be a lot easier to monitor and only makes sense. Now I am not really a fan of Facebook in the first place mind you because of the security issues they have had over the long run, but I do know they are trying to improve things. However I think it is hindered by how they want all information public and that only leads to attracting even more scammers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see why they blocked it. With the rise of spam becoming an even larger problem and social networking becoming a very popular avenue for spammers to now scam people and trick people into following links that lead them to sites that redirect to yet another site to force them to install malicious content to their computers in the back ground without them knowing and stealing their bank info or passwords and then hijacking their facebook account .. Facebook had to do something! I think it is a wise move as their own url shortener service would be a lot easier to monitor and only makes sense. Now I am not really a fan of Facebook in the first place mind you because of the security issues they have had over the long run, but I do know they are trying to improve things. However I think it is hindered by how they want all information public and that only leads to attracting even more scammers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://wdawe.com/index.php/careful-when-using-url-shorteners-with-facebook?blog=1#c394</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
